• This site contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, Poker Chip Forum may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

Hustler Casino Live (5 Viewers)

BGinGA said:
Does the reddit poster use " ... " punctuation in his posts?
Click to expand...

Sure, by itself, it's hardly worth mentioning. In combination with "wouldn't not" though, it means a lot. Find enough common errors and quirks between two text documents and you can effectively prove they were written by the same person. I don't know what you think the likelihood that both Robbi and Bryan would each separately use "wouldn't not" and "xxx ... xxx" in their messages is, but I promise you, it's WAY, WAY less than 1%.

Also, the likelihoods of each additional quirk are multiplicative, not additive. So, if there's a 5% chance that they both use "wouldn't not" and a 10% chance that they both use "xxx ... xxx", then the likelihood of them doing both would be 0.5%.

And before you idiots start crying about the math, these numbers are just randomly made up values to help you understand the math. The likelihood of them both using "wouldn't not" alone is FAR less than 5%. Surely, it's far less than 1% in fact.
 
Last edited:
Let's get back on track here.
Image-1.jpg
 
RainmanTrail said:
Sure, by itself, it's hardly worth mentioning. In combination with "wouldn't not" though, it means a lot. Find enough common errors and quirks between two text documents and you can effectively prove they were written by the same person. I don't know what you think the likelihood that both Robbi and Bryan would each separately use "wouldn't not" and "xxx ... xxx" in their messages is, but I promise you, it's WAY, WAY less than 1%.

Also, the likelihoods of each additional quirk are multiplicative, not additive. So, if there's a 5% chance that they both use "wouldn't not" and a 10% chance that they both use "xxx ... xxx", then the likelihood of them doing both would be 0.5%.

And before you idiots start crying about the math, these numbers are just randomly made up values to help you understand the math. The likelihood of them both using "wouldn't not" alone is FAR less than 5%. Surely, it's far less than 1% in fact.
Click to expand...
I found your secret message. See above.

Also, I believe they you also used the words:

"a", "to", "the", and most incriminating of all "cheat" and "poker".

Also, I used my secret decoder ring and found an even more insidious message hidden in your post. See below!

Screenshot_20221010_130015.jpg


We're on to you Bry-Robbi-Trail.

Chips!! Seat two OPEN!
 
Every time I pop my head back into this thread, I'm reminded of why it's possible that some poker players are able to earn a living off of others. Robbi's posts and "Bryan's" DM to her are almost certainly written by the same person. Yet the PCF dolt brigade sits there laughing at the evidence that's right in front of their eyes, but they can't see it. Just like with the hand itself. The fact that the hand almost certainly involved some form of cheating by Robbi was as clear as day the moment it happened, but the masses were incapable of solving the riddle. There are levels to this game.
 
eightyWon said:
View attachment 1003985
Click to expand...

Sorry it was a wide post so hard to see on mobile devices, here's the text the guy posted on my video:

No she didn’t cheat. Half of these poker players are patriarchal trump supporters who can’t take losing to a woman. She thought she had J3. A pair of 3s. She had been getting pushed around on pots by Garret and knew her 3s could be good. She was right….if she didn’t make the ROOKIE mistake of thinking she had J3, and she actually had J4—for no pair nothing (board was 10-10-9-3). Garret had 87. A straight draw and a flush draw. She called the all in on the turn with what she THOUGHT was bottom pair—-Garret has been making easy money off of this game consistently having novice players playing against pros on TV. It finally bit him. He got beat by a pure rookie mistake. Because she’s a ROOKIE she felt confused afterwards and was also a little embarrassed for making the mistake. THEN because she doesn’t know poker that well, she GAVE GARRET THE MONEY BACK when he asked for it???!!!! YOU NEVER ASK FOR YOUR MONEY BACK FROM A PLAYER AFTER A HAND—-Garret, by result, BULLIED this WOMAN who is new to the game out of her rightful money——-HIS EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE ITS JUST A CRAZY TRUMP CONSPIRACY THEORY
Click to expand...
 
Bart just released another video, like 20 min wrong. He's 99% sure that she didn't think she had J3 and he's definitely leaning toward cheating (though he makes no attempt to guess how.)

 
upNdown said:
Thing is, 1) I watch most of Bart's videos anyway because 2) I respect his poker opinions. So, I don't FEEL like a chump for clicking on that one?
Click to expand...
I'm not very familiar with the guy, I'm sure he's poker smart. I'm just being a douche, if that wasn't apparent. There's just a million videos regurgitating all the same stuff. This is the best thing that ever happened for poker content creators.
 
buffalojim said:
I'm not very familiar with the guy, I'm sure he's poker smart. I'm just being a douche, if that wasn't apparent. There's just a million videos regurgitating all the same stuff. This is the best thing that ever happened for poker content creators.
Click to expand...

My first video on this whole situation was my most viewed video on my channel and it's not even close!
 
buffalojim said:
I'm not very familiar with the guy, I'm sure he's poker smart. I'm just being a douche, if that wasn't apparent. There's just a million videos regurgitating all the same stuff. This is the best thing that ever happened for poker content creators.
Click to expand...
He's good. He releases a few videos a week. Each video is a 15-20 minute discussion with a caller, analyzing each street of cash hand they played, almost always $1/2 - $2/5. So it feels relevant.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Register

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Similar threads

Santa123
Hustler Casino Live brings back clay
Replies
6
Views
307
bananapeel
B
M
New Cards on Hustler Casino Live?
Replies
5
Views
593
RocAFella1
RocAFella1
Santa123
New Chips @ Hustler Casino Live
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
LeLe
LeLe
C
Hustler Casino Live Chips.
Replies
13
Views
1K
seyff45
seyff45
L
Hustler Casino new chips
Replies
8
Views
600
Santa123
Santa123
Back
Top Bottom