No one said he did wrong
You literally accused him of possibly being a thief
No one said he did wrong
You literally accused him of possibly being a thief
The other members on this forum shouldn't be the ones to decide how this goes down.
Not so fast. If they were stuck in Customs because the package contents or value was misrepresented it could have been held for duties/taxes etc. When items are not claimed after a period of time, they get sold off. No idea if that happened but its a possibility. The shipper would be the responsible party to correct the problem and get the package released.
Unless Tommy's conjecture is correct that the box was somehow lost by either the carrier or customs, unable to be identified, and sold off as a result, it's absolutely clear that these chips are stolen property.
It's equally clear that luv2breformed has not committed any crime.
The loss to Davin is undoubtedly not large enough to make it worth the legal fees required to pursue an investigation and recover the chips through the legal system.
@luv2breformed: Dude, I think your conduct has been pathetic and despicable, from the point of your initial reluctance to reveal your seller's information onward. Hell, any decent person would have been feeling guilty in the first place about taking advantage of the seller by paying $50 for $2K+ worth of chips. But your unrestrained avarice blinded you to the potential dangers of such a buy, and your reluctance to accept the evidence and lip service to "doing the right thing" reveal you to be awfully weak in the ethics and morals departments.
I think @luv2breformed specifically asked us to be involved though. The problem is that his poll only has two options, with only one of them "winning" in each scenario. There needs to be a mutual ground where both parties give a little
Unless Tommy's conjecture is correct that the box was somehow lost by either the carrier or customs, unable to be identified, and sold off as a result, it's absolutely clear that these chips are stolen property.
It's equally clear that luv2breformed has not committed any crime.
The loss to Davin is undoubtedly not large enough to make it worth the legal fees required to pursue an investigation and recover the chips through the legal system.
@luv2breformed: Dude, I think your conduct has been pathetic and despicable, from the point of your initial reluctance to reveal your seller's information onward. Hell, any decent person would have been feeling guilty in the first place about taking advantage of the seller by paying $50 for $2K+ worth of chips. But your unrestrained avarice blinded you to the potential dangers of such a buy, and your reluctance to accept the evidence and lip service to "doing the right thing" reveal you to be awfully weak in the ethics and morals departments.
This has been stated multiple times and I definitely agree he did nothing wrong & If davin paid for the chips in the beginning and was never reimbursed the picture evidence is pretty damn clear that the chips are the lost chips then just split them up between the 2 of you guys and y’all both win!!!@luv2breformed is clearly f@ckin innocent
im waiting for that opportunity until then i just read commentsI don’t feel like either party should lose but I feel like you guys should get together and come to an agreement between the 2 of you away from the community. It’s up to you guys on how to make the deal good for both.
If he bought someone's wallet on eBay? THAT WOULD BE WEIRD.Here’s a thought experiment:
What would everyone think if, instead of poker chips, we were talking about someone’s wallet?
I didn’t tell the truth then because it would hurt the other chips from moving if there was no 1’s I can honestly say thatI thought the box in customs had 1000 $1 chips in it @davinView attachment 218684
I bought a Cancun set from Davin this year in an auction. He told me about the missing box at the time because I got 2 racks of ones (not many folks got that many ones) and he mentioned hoping his other box would come through with more of them.
I feel bad but these chips are clearly the ones that Davin paid for and never received. If you accept that, I don’t know how the outcome can be anything other that returning the chips to the rightful owner.
The satisfaction of doing the right thing is worth far more than $2,500.
I’m sure that most would want to protect a chip source if we had the chance... no crime there... and I feel that once he has heard the opinions and advice from other members here and after seeing the pictures he wants to do the right thing... I don’t feel that he should be completely out of the good deal all together since I don’t think many here are finding him guilty of doing anything wrong... I feel like a lot of us need to lay back a bit and let them work it out.@luv2breformed: Dude, I think your conduct has been pathetic and despicable, from the point of your initial reluctance to reveal your seller's information onward. Hell, any decent person would have been feeling guilty in the first place about taking advantage of the seller by paying $50 for $2K+ worth of chips. But your unrestrained avarice blinded you to the potential dangers of such a buy, and your reluctance to accept the evidence and lip service to "doing the right thing" reveal you to be awfully weak in the ethics and morals departments.
Well, ain't that alittle shady....I didn’t tell the truth then because it would hurt the other chips from moving if there was no 1’s I can honestly say that
Here’s a thought experiment:
What would everyone think if, instead of poker chips, we were talking about someone’s wallet?
Here’s a thought experiment:
What would everyone think if, instead of poker chips, we were talking about someone’s wallet?
I didn’t tell the truth then because it would hurt the other chips from moving if there was no 1’s I can honestly say that
Well, ain't that alittle shady....
Not so fast. If they were stuck in Customs because the package contents or value was misrepresented it could have been held for duties/taxes etc. When items are not claimed after a period of time, they get sold off. No idea if that happened but its a possibility. The shipper would be the responsible party to correct the problem and get the package released.