Well, you do have a lot of really cool chips?
Well, you do have a lot of really cool chips?
Possible. But do I get to play with your chips or not?
So it’s people like you that decided it should be photosystem II first, and *then* photosystem IOne barrier is to confirm the 1852 recipe cotton proportions you would need break down a 1852 chip. Recipe could have changed since then.
I mean. I'm no @ovoPossible. But do I get to play with your chips or not?
Being less silly, I am dismayed at how uncommon clays are in my country, land of injection molded chips.
you are so much more, plus a cacti loverI mean. I'm no @ovo
40% is right in line with most other fiber filled composites.
you are so much more, plus a cacti lover
If you would have asked me a year ago if a cotton argument would be occuring in PCF, I would have said "I highly doubt it."Do you acknowledge that "10-oz cotton" refers to sheets of woven cotton fabric as opposed to raw fluffy cotton?
It’s composed of high quality, uniform, short fibers. Who said anything about “raw fluffy cotton”?I've pointed this out numerous times already, but you haven't addressed it. So, I'll ask you point blank. Do you acknowledge that "10-oz cotton" refers to sheets of woven cotton fabric as opposed to raw fluffy cotton?
It’s composed of high quality, uniform, short fibers. Who said anything about “raw fluffy cotton”?
Your imagination must be overwhelmed.
Are clay chips made of clay?I'll ask you again. Do you acknowledge that "10-oz cotton" refers to the fabric weight of sheets of woven cotton fabric, and not a type (or quality) of cotton that was picked from a plant?
Do you acknowledge that "10-oz cotton", "5-oz cotton", and "8-oz cotton" are not different types of cotton and that they all come from the same plant, and that the only difference is how much cotton was used when weaving the fabric into different thread weights/counts?
Are clay chips made of clay?
You are hilarious. Of course 10oz refers to a fabric weight (or fiber weight). It is constructed from a high quality, uniformly, short fiber. Maybe they bought this dense high quality fabric and processed it to be added to the composite matrix? Point is…who cares?Why do you keep dodging this question about cotton weights referring to woven fabrics? You said you're not trolling, yet here you are, doing precisely that.
Do you acknowledge what I said about cotton weights referring to woven fabrics, and not to raw cotton picked from a plant, or not? It's a simple question. Yes, or no.
You are hilarious. Of course 10oz refers to a fabric weight (or fiber weight). It is constructed from a high quality, uniformly, short fiber. Maybe they bought this dense high quality fabric and processed it to be added to the composite matrix? Point is…who cares?
Now…stop deflecting.
The reason we all started this debate.
Do you acknowledge you are 100% wrong about your initial assertion?
Do you even remember?
Will you pay the people that took your bet?
Probably not, I guess…
Found this…interesting. Notice is references fiber weight. Hmmm.
What’s a geopolymer?
View attachment 1266516
https://www.researchgate.net/public...ced_polymer_composites_and_their_applications
Nevermind…the density of lead is no match for the density of @RainmanTrail.Ya, no shit Sherlock. People make all sorts of shit out of woven fabric and epoxy. I saw a guy make a nice table the other day from 50 sheets of denim and 20 gallons of epoxy. But you know what they don't make out of that? Poker chips!
You still haven't addressed the issue of the lack of lead content in your interpretation of the formula though. Honestly, this should have immediately told you that you had it wrong just by looking at the lead silicate weight alone. There is a significant difference between the chip weights of leaded and unleaded chips (about 22-25%). Yet your formula says that a mere 3 ounces of lead is used across the entire batch, accounting for a mere 1.4% of the chip weight? Explain that one Einstein. I'll wait...
Nevermind…the density of lead is no match for the density of @RainmanTrail.
Your understanding of basic chemistry, composites, etc is laughable.
I was enjoying this discussion…you win.
Birds aren’t real…dig deeper Watson.
Nevermind…the density of lead is no match for the density of @RainmanTrail.
Your understanding of basic chemistry, composites, etc is laughable.
I was enjoying this discussion…you win.
Birds aren’t real…dig deeper Watson.
They are “weighted”…with TiO2 and PbO-SiO2.Explain the lack of lead in your leaded chips formula.
They are “weighted”…with TiO2 and PbO-SiO2.
You’ll have to ask the TRK chef…
Ah yes, that perfectly explains why the chips lose 25% of their weight after removing the lead (which makes up a mere 1.4% of your formula).
don’t you numberwang boffins know how to calculate the mass of a poker chip?
Should be easy to figure out if lead is 50% or 3% of that volume?