I received mine. Poker size. I have only handled them for 10 minutes, so my quick impressions aren't worth much honestly. I really like the front font design of Faded Spade, and like the old ones mostly, but the stiffness and slipperyness of the old ones made them a non-starter for my group. From my
first impressions, they have really only addressed one of my 4 dislikes from the 2.0 version, and that one is the one that I have never seen anyone else mention!
Comparison pictures, new 3.0 on the left, old 2.0 on the right.
Thickness/Stiffness - Seems the same to me. I compared decks. The thickness seems to be indentical.
View attachment 985776
Boring Back Design - Well, I guess if you think the alternating orientation of the spades on one row is a breakthrough... great. For me, same boring backs.
View attachment 985777
Slippery - Way to early to tell. Just have not handled them enough.
By the pictures, I bet you can easily spot the one problem that I had with the old cards that they actually did address. Anyone?
View attachment 985781
In an homage to Dix, I tried my best to design my own card-o-meter, but failed miserably! In my unscientific test, the flex is the same.
View attachment 985784