They replied on twitter
I like it if so.
Is that perhaps the new jumbo font?
Weird, I’m east coast and mine are in California
I hope so. Those new backs would be an improvement. The old backs are really boring.
I agree!I hope so. Those new backs would be an improvement. The old backs are really boring.
Same. I feel so alone. HahaStill no shipping notification here, I ordered 8/1.
Same hereMine haven’t moved since the 6th.
View attachment 983515
Same here. I was like, "Cool, my re-shipper who's in California should get them real quick," but no..A hell of a weird route when my house is less than a 100 miles away from the original destination 3 days ago, and is now 4 hours and 45 minutes away in another state and not yet with the USPS?
View attachment 983498
Nice, I placed the same order as you and like the look of them. Wish they changed up the back but great to hear they are more flexible, that was the #1 complaint of players in my game.Mine came in.
I also added a comparison of the front and back between 2.0 and 3.0.
(blue backs = 2.0)
My initial thoughts, they feel more like Copag now and much easier to shuffle. They’re not as thick anymore. Also, the colors on 3.0 are more Vibrant
The 2.0 corners are more rounded too
Sorry in advance for the vertical images!
This sounds promising. But going from the cardboard stiffness of 2.0 to ”Copac like” is one helluva transition. Would need some additional reasurranceMine came in.
I also added a comparison of the front and back between 2.0 and 3.0.
(blue backs = 2.0)
My initial thoughts, they feel more like Copag now and much easier to shuffle. They’re not as thick anymore. Also, the colors on 3.0 are more Vibrant
The 2.0 corners are more rounded too
Sorry in advance for the vertical images!
Can you do a comparison pic of the thickness of the 2.0 deck vs 3.0 vs copag?Mine came in.
I also added a comparison of the front and back between 2.0 and 3.0.
(blue backs = 2.0)
My initial thoughts, they feel more like Copag now and much easier to shuffle. They’re not as thick anymore. Also, the colors on 3.0 are more Vibrant
The 2.0 corners are more rounded too
Sorry in advance for the vertical images!
No, they are definitely less slipperyAre they as slippery as the 2.0?
Not sure if these visuals helpCan you do a comparison pic of the thickness of the 2.0 deck vs 3.0 vs copag?
Get an idea of how much thinner the 3.0 is?
Thanks, but I was thinking of full deck pictures. So we can get an aggregate view of thickness.Not sure if these visuals help
The 2.0(blue) is slightly thicker but it’s hard to see
2x 3.0’s together feel like a single 2.0
Thanks, but I was thinking of full deck pictures. So we can get an aggregate view of thickness.