Probably not, if he tries to sell them at the prices he paid for them.Can we just get WindWalker to release all of his chips back to the public and the market will correct itself............
Probably not, if he tries to sell them at the prices he paid for them.Can we just get WindWalker to release all of his chips back to the public and the market will correct itself............
Ovo and Tuna are both sweet as pie...they are just messing with youHahaha
I don’t follow why it matters or correlates when I joined PCF saying I agree website traffic would be cool to know. Not the first time @ovo has shot across the bow lol
The government isn’t giving out any more free money for a couple of months yet.
Would never happen and if it did, the same douchebags who took advantage of him from the beginning would just be stepping on top of each other to do the same thing again.Can we just get WindWalker to release all of his chips back to the public and the market will correct itself............
Would never happen and if it did, the same douchebags who took advantage of him from the beginning would just be stepping on top of each other to do the same thing again.
The combination of “Fuck You Money,” and “Douchebagery” created a situation that will most likely never reverse itself.
it’s definitely insured but I don’t think it’s borrowed against. You’re betting on insane ROI on collector items (example but not remotely close) Mickey mantle card was sold for $100K in the 90s now worth $20M+. And most collectors his size have so much money in the market this is just fun/diversified.Despite my personal distaste, always found the issues with WW as a chipper laughable. We see it here on a constant basis, someone wants something or needs to fill a gap, and overpays to get it done.
Every WTB of Looking For ad out there better be offering above market price, otherwise why are you posting?
The only part I am curious in and the reason I don’t think we will ever see chips again from serious collectors (idk if there’s one outside of WW) - don’t they monetize their collections?
As in, I now found, purchased, and own X# of one of a kind or limited quantity clay discs. Regardless of what I paid, I determine their value now, as I would only ever sell for $Y. Now I set the value as high as possible, have it insured for as high as possible, and now can borrow against that asset.
I might be completely 100% wrong as this is a total guess, but it’s hard to imagine anyone with accountants and a head for business/financials would let an asset like a high end collection sit somewhere without actively making money on it. I’m guessing it’s insured, borrowed against, and making money in markets.
His collection is interesting in the sense that it consists mostly of large playable sets. If he was able to acquire all of the cocaine giraffes in existence, there is literally no one else looking to complete a playable set. Individually they don’t hold much value, as they are known to exist in quantity. So his best bet would be to sell a bunch of smaller sets, and create a competitive marketit’s definitely insured but I don’t think it’s borrowed against. You’re betting on insane ROI on collector items (example but not remotely close) Mickey mantle card was sold for $100K in the 90s now worth $20M+. And most collectors his size have so much money in the market this is just fun/diversified.
Yeah I figured this as well. Nothing to do with this particular individual, but in general money makes money - be it being educated on tax loopholes, leveraging debt, etc.it’s definitely insured but I don’t think it’s borrowed against. You’re betting on insane ROI on collector items (example but not remotely close) Mickey mantle card was sold for $100K in the 90s now worth $20M+. And most collectors his size have so much money in the market this is just fun/diversified.
Huh? Why? His best bet is to sell off chips so that there is a competitive market to increase the price and people seeking his remaining chips?His collection is interesting in the sense that it consists mostly of large playable sets. If he was able to acquire all of the cocaine giraffes in existence, there is literally no one else looking to complete a playable set. Individually they don’t hold much value, as they are known to exist in quantity. So his best bet would be to sell a bunch of smaller sets, and create a competitive market
If you call his collection penultimate, I wonder which one would be considered as the ultimate one?In Windwalker’s quest to have the penultimate collection he was able to pay obscene money for anything he wanted. Even if he does let go of any chips they will be way out of my price range.
Don’t poke the bear. His first post in his own thread made as much sense as his original post.If you call his collection penultimate, I wonder which one would be considered as the ultimate one?
The big thing with collections/collector items is money laundering…Yeah I figured this as well. Nothing to do with this particular individual, but in general money makes money - be it being educated on tax loopholes, leveraging debt, etc.
I would imagine this specific type of scenario depends on the collection value vs their net worth.
I don’t know how far someone can stretch the limits on valuation, but if I own every single Mickey mantle card, I can somewhat set the market cost. And if there was ever one that became available, it would behooves me to pick it up because that would just further increase the value of the rest I have.
Idk, lol just spitballing. I’m very uneducated in these departments and currently just now facing the needs of our family needing a tax person, an accountant, etc. With not being an expert in these areas, it feels overwhelming to find the right folks who can help out.
Hell, it’s like pulling teeth to get my grandma to properly set up her personal affairs so that we aren’t hit with an absolutely giant tax hit on her house.
Was wondering the same thing!If you call his collection penultimate, I wonder which one would be considered as the ultimate one?
I’m working on it bro. Sell me some lead.If you call his collection penultimate, I wonder which one would be considered as the ultimate one?
Lol I mean “art”. Phew what a blatant and publicly known way of the wealthy moving money and illegal speculation.The big thing with collections/collector items is money laundering…
… It’s hard to imagine anyone with accountants and a head for business/financials would let an asset like a high end collection sit somewhere without actively making money on it. I’m guessing it’s insured, borrowed against, and making money in markets.
God speed, The Windwalker.Is this where we make up stories about members that haven’t logged in in a while? I heard he’s leading a guerrilla force in Ukraine that is silently protecting a baby formula complex.
Just to be clear, are we talking about all the fictional chips too (like the ones from the guy on the porch) or just the real ones?Sadly, I tend to think someone with a massive and choice collection (if such a collector really ever wanted to sell) would realize more value by donating the whole shebang to a museum, then declaring the entire cost basis as a tax write-off.
… because simple supply-and-demand economics suggest that it would be very hard to sell a huge collection like that without flooding and exhausting the market, especially for any collection assembled at exceptional, top-dollar expense.
Even spread out over time, getting that many sets into the relatively tiny chip ecosystem would steadily drive prices down. Yes, we have maybe a dozen whales here who might pay big prices for a few choice sets, and a few off-site. But you’d need a dozen dozens of very well-heeled buyers to even make a dent.
Just to be clear, are we talking about all the fictional chips too (like the ones from the guy on the porch) or just the real ones?
I think you are looking at it too narrowly, as is the OP. The "market" is not limited to PCF. It is the entire world. So the answer to the question posited by the OP is an unequivocal "no", the "market" is not saturated and never will be. Whether the PCFcentric market is saturated is a different question and even that market would need to be further broken down into specific categories with potentially different answers--NAGB, Tina, Old lead, RHC, casino, Matsui, ceramics, etc. Everyone has something different that rocks their boat.Despite my personal distaste, always found the issues with WW as a chipper laughable. We see it here on a constant basis, someone wants something or needs to fill a gap, and overpays to get it done.
Every WTB of Looking For ad out there better be offering above market price, otherwise why are you posting?
The only part I am curious in and the reason I don’t think we will ever see chips again from serious collectors (idk if there’s one outside of WW) - don’t they monetize their collections?
As in, I now found, purchased, and own X# of one of a kind or limited quantity clay discs. Regardless of what I paid, I determine their value now, as I would only ever sell for $Y. Now I set the value as high as possible, have it insured for as high as possible, and now can borrow against that asset.
I might be completely 100% wrong as this is a total guess, but it’s hard to imagine anyone with accountants and a head for business/financials would let an asset like a high end collection sit somewhere without actively making money on it. I’m guessing it’s insured, borrowed against, and making money in markets.