buffalojim
Royal Flush
I watched a lot of this. I think I'm more confused and don't really know what to think. Basically...RIP joins at 6:17
Dwan joins & starts asking the questions at 6:45
JR joins at 7:47 (after RIP left)
I watched a lot of this. I think I'm more confused and don't really know what to think. Basically...RIP joins at 6:17
Dwan joins & starts asking the questions at 6:45
JR joins at 7:47 (after RIP left)
Vloggers sir, get with the program lolthis thing is a windfall for poker bloggers or whatever the fuck you call talk show hosts these days
I will never get with the program, get off my lawnVloggers sir, get with the program lol
A year or two ago, I pronounced that word “vee-logger” and my high school daughter nearly fell over, laughing at me. ShrugVloggers sir, get with the program lol
I definitely need a Charlie chart for this one.Of anything that has been put out there, I think this is the closest thing that can be considered a smoking gun.
Look at the styles of writing in these excerpts. Bryan's alleged DM on the left, public statements from Robbi on the right.
The whole reason I posted that tweet is that both Robbi in a public statement and "Bryan" both used "wouldn't not" in their tweets/public statements.I definitely need a Charlie chart for this one.
1. Bryan is seen on video stealing from her.
2. She doesn’t press charges.
3. Because of 1+ 2, we assume they cheated together.
4. We see a text from him to her saying he believes she didn’t cheat.
5. Nobody buys that.
6. She decides to press charges against him.
If she wrote that text from him, we should assume he sent it and promised not to sell her out, in exchange for cash or something.
Since that didn’t work, she decided to announce she was pressing charges against him. So he’s not going to sell her out now, why? In exchange for even more cash?
This is freaking nuts
Yeah, I get it. Just trying to figure out how all these pieces fit together.The whole reason I posted that tweet is that both Robbi in a public statement and "Bryan" both used "wouldn't not" in their tweets/public statements.
It's very obvious to me now that Robbi wrote that DM from "Bryan".
While there's still no physical evidence of cheating, why would Robbi manufacture a fake DM? This just doesn't make sense. Is she trying to hide a connection between her and Bryan? I just don't see a benefit in doing this.Yeah, I get it. Just trying to figure out how all these pieces fit together.
My best guess now is that Robbi is just crazy and not too bright and scrambling.
The majority of the public opinion seemed to be on her side.While there's still no physical evidence of cheating, why would Robbi manufacture a fake DM? This just doesn't make sense. Is she trying to hide a connection between her and Bryan? I just don't see a benefit in doing this.
That's pretty much exactly what I take from it.The majority of the public opinion seemed to be on her side.
Then when Hustler announced Bryan was stealing chips, public opinion swung significantly.
So she manufactured that message to make Bryan look like even a sadder sack, but to make her look innocent, right?
I mean she must have had to pay him a bunch to get him to go along with it. But she felt like she had to do something after public opinion swung against her, right?
I dunno.
All of this, as an outsider, is incredibly hilarious. Everybody turning on everybody. I'm still right in the middle, maybe still leaning towards no cheat, but damn there is a lot of collateral damage going on here and people's names being dragged through the mud. Will anybody even want to play against each other after all this?WTF is going on here.....
Rip regarding Nik Airball
You think he'll confess to a felony for a quarter million dollars?II think Bryan is going to sing like a canary. He knows about way more than the Robbi saga. Take the money and go into witness protection. A quarter million is more than enough to start a new life.
He takes a plea deal in exchange for giving up what he knows about the bigger scheme.You think he'll confess to a felony for a quarter million dollars?
I mean, he does appear to make some rather poor life choices, so I guess maybe...
I was thinking the same thing, but then I thought about it some more. Do the authorities care?If Robbi presses charges I look to cop a plea deal and tell the authorities everything that he knows.
This isn't like busting the Gottis. I don't think anybody in law enforcement gives a rat's ass.He takes a plea deal in exchange for giving up what he knows about the bigger scheme.
It would be on Vertucci and Feldman to pursue charges as it would be considered a private game, I would think.I was thinking the same thing, but then I thought about it some more. Do the authorities care?
Laws vary state to state probably. But we learned with Postle that at least in that jurisdiction, you can’t sue somebody civilly for cheating at gambling because the courts don’t care. So can you be prosecuted criminally for cheating? Yes, I’m thinking that the casinos do press charges against cheaters, right?
But then that raises the question, was this a Hustler Casino game, or was this a private poker game that happened to be played at the Hustler? I think that’s a legit question, and if it turns out it is actually a private game, then maybe the authorities don’t care if there was cheating going on? So maybe Bryan actually has nothing to offer the authorities in exchange for a plea bargain.
There’s a bunch of ifs there that I don’t have the answers for. But Robbi’s fancy lawyer husband might know someone who knows someone who knows the answers.
Thanks for sharing this.RIP joins at 6:17
Dwan joins & starts asking the questions at 6:45
JR joins at 7:47 (after RIP left)
Want to see something even more Sus?Of anything that has been put out there, I think this is the closest thing that can be considered a smoking gun.
Look at the styles of writing in these excerpts. Bryan's alleged DM on the left, public statements from Robbi on the right.
Of anything that has been put out there, I think this is the closest thing that can be considered a smoking gun.
Look at the styles of writing in these excerpts. Bryan's alleged DM on the left, public statements from Robbi on the right.
You do realize that the @JMC9389 post that you quote has a snapshot or Bryan using "..." and he doesn't use a space before.Someone else also pointed out a few days ago that when Robbi uses "..." after a sentence that she places a space both before and after the dots, like "lorem ... ipsum" rather than "lorem... ipsum". Of course, "Bryan" does this as well.
Also, her and Bryan's real Twitter accounts followed each other prior to this all going down according to Doug Polk.