Hosted a game last night (tournament), and an older guy made some weird comments that had us scratching our heads. This guy is very nice, plays a lot of poker locally, and is even a city councilman in his home city... he's generally well respected. Probably around 70 years old, but doesn't present as elderly.
I'm dealing the hand, and this older gent (OG) is involved in a three-way all in. $10 Bounties are in play.
OG had 11k, has AA
V1 has 12k, has 99
V2 has 15k, has AK
Board runs out Q59 2 5
V1 clearly wins with the boat, I count out his stack, he has OG covered. V2 is still in the tourney with 3k. Before I ship stacks, OG announces that he accepts that V1 gets the main pot, but wonders why he isn't getting V2's stack, since he clearly beat him with his AA. I think (and the table agreed) that I did a decent job of clearly and calmly explaining that he was only eligible to win as much as he had in his stack, and that the 3k in V2's stack wasn't in play, because he covered all the players. OG repeated several times that in the games he normally plays in, that's not the rules... but that he accepts MY ruling... I've played in many local games with OG and know that he doesn't play anywhere that allows a short stack to win a larger stacks chips even if he has the better hand. He was obviously confused. But he was very adamant that my ruling was abnormal. Weird...
So now I'm torn here. OG is a nice guy, and he can be a decent player, albeit I think he's not as winning a player as many others in my game. But he good for the game, and not just financially. He's reliable, shows up when he says he will, is always bringing a snack to share, etc.. but IF there is some actual dementia involved, and he's not making rational decisions, I hate to continue to invite him... when money is involved. I would never want to take advantage of someone like that.. Im not going to rush to any hasty decisions, but I'll definitely keep an eye on him moving forward.
Has anyone else run into aging players with Cognitive issues?
I'm dealing the hand, and this older gent (OG) is involved in a three-way all in. $10 Bounties are in play.
OG had 11k, has AA
V1 has 12k, has 99
V2 has 15k, has AK
Board runs out Q59 2 5
V1 clearly wins with the boat, I count out his stack, he has OG covered. V2 is still in the tourney with 3k. Before I ship stacks, OG announces that he accepts that V1 gets the main pot, but wonders why he isn't getting V2's stack, since he clearly beat him with his AA. I think (and the table agreed) that I did a decent job of clearly and calmly explaining that he was only eligible to win as much as he had in his stack, and that the 3k in V2's stack wasn't in play, because he covered all the players. OG repeated several times that in the games he normally plays in, that's not the rules... but that he accepts MY ruling... I've played in many local games with OG and know that he doesn't play anywhere that allows a short stack to win a larger stacks chips even if he has the better hand. He was obviously confused. But he was very adamant that my ruling was abnormal. Weird...
So now I'm torn here. OG is a nice guy, and he can be a decent player, albeit I think he's not as winning a player as many others in my game. But he good for the game, and not just financially. He's reliable, shows up when he says he will, is always bringing a snack to share, etc.. but IF there is some actual dementia involved, and he's not making rational decisions, I hate to continue to invite him... when money is involved. I would never want to take advantage of someone like that.. Im not going to rush to any hasty decisions, but I'll definitely keep an eye on him moving forward.
Has anyone else run into aging players with Cognitive issues?