Are we ever going to find out who got those $500's? Or are those two people going to have to keep them hidden away forever, like a stolen work of art?
Intriguing.
The fact that they posted their intentions is entirely relevant because this was not a clear cut rules violation and Jim conceded as much. It was more of a "spirit of the limits" thing. It's a bit harsh to call folks greedy when they employed a strategy that has been used in past sales and openly discussed within this sale's thread without censure. Jim had the chance to make pre-sale rules adjustments if things were getting out of line as people discussed buying strategy.And now the issue is that those of us that had skipped this sale in hopes of buying the secondary Native Lights are SOL now thanks to a couple of greedy individuals that intentionally violated the rules of the sale. Whether they posted their intentions prior to the start of the sale is irrelevant.
If anyone is to "blame" it's those who blew this thread up calling out and trashing those who employed a strategy they likely did not realize was against the rules. The strategy was discussed before the sale and not one single person in this thread (or in any of Jims past sales) mentioned it being against the rules... had ANYONE said anything it likely would have become a point of discussion and ultimately, quite probably, would have been resolved before the sale.And now the issue is that those of us that had skipped this sale in hopes of buying the secondary Native Lights are SOL now thanks to a couple of greedy individuals that intentionally violated the rules of the sale. Whether they posted their intentions prior to the start of the sale is irrelevant.
For the record I got no $500s but it wasn't for lack of trying, and my attempts included the strategy being bashed because I assumed it was commonplace. If you'd like to throw pitchforks in my direction feel free.
I can imagine that Jim and others did not read every single post in this thread. If I had seen those posts I certainly would have spoken up.If anyone is to "blame" it's those who blew this thread up calling out and trashing those who employed a strategy they likely did not realize was against the rules. The strategy was discussed before the sale and not one single person in this thread (or in any of Jims past sales) mentioned it being against the rules... had ANYONE said anything it likely would have become a point of discussion and ultimately, quite probably, would have been resolved before the sale.
Seeing how pissed people got after the sale I am genuinely interested in knowing why apparently no one had a problem with it beforehand.
For the record I got no $500s but it wasn't for lack of trying, and my attempts included the strategy being bashed because I assumed it was commonplace. If you'd like to throw pitchforks in my direction feel free.
------------EI am guessing that the two individuals who got 160 each, which was 80% of the supply, are going to try to remain as anonymous as possible. There are a lot of torches and pitchforks waiting for them!
I can imagine that Jim and others did not read every single post in this thread. If I had seen those posts I certainly would have spoken up.
EVERYBODY knew the intent behind Jim's limit and just because they did not get called out after openly suggesting ways to circumvent the limits doesn't make it ok.
Sorry, but it's already been well-established (both here in this thread and elsewhere) that your rant is inaccurate.EVERYBODY knew the intent behind Jim's limit and just because they did not get called out after openly suggesting ways to circumvent the limits doesn't make it ok.
Sorry, but it's already been well-established (both here in this thread and elsewhere) that your rant is inaccurate.
Submitting multiple orders and combining them afterwards has long been a SOP in TCR sales; in fact it was almost a neccessity in some cases where items were partially sold out at payment time. Going back and ordering more non-restricted chips was often required, so that the limit restrictions were ~not~ violated.
For once I agree with BGinGA
Lol, just once??For once I agree with BGinGA
Everybody? In all caps no less? I didn't. Other upstanding members of the forum have said they didn't. The guy who openly posted that it was his strategy didn't, nor did the six replies it received which more or less said "good idea".EVERYBODY knew the intent behind Jim's limit and just because they did not get called out after openly suggesting ways to circumvent the limits doesn't make it ok.
C.Do you think I'm a serial flipper? A bad person? A shady member of the forum?
Do you think I'm a serial flipper? A bad person? A shady member of the forum?
1440So, if someone got 160 of the $500s, how many of each of the other denominations did they need to order?
I'm not interested on the Native Lights myself, but was looking forward to the excitement of some of the people here purchasing sets and posting Pr0n... Instead, reading the posts here are just painfully annoying (to me)...
...
Jim's sales used to be soooooo fun and exciting...
Imagine how much more drama there would be if the inlays were actually attractive